HIGGINS
v.
UNITED STATES

M.D. Fla. | 2024-06-07
No. 6:23-cv-138
2024 FFL 12890 District Court, M.D. Florida (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This case involves a district court's approval of a settlement agreement in a civil matter concerning a minor. The court adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation to approve the settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.


Holding

The court approved the settlement agreement and dismissed the case with prejudice after adopting the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation recommending approval.


Key Quotes

“the Court examines the R&R for clear error only”

Establishes the standard of review applied when no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's recommendation

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The case involves a settlement of a minor, with the plaintiff filing an amended unopposed motion to approve the settlement. A U.S. Magistrate Judge is…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Amended Unopposed Motion to Approve the Settlement of Minor, TTP. (Doc. 26 (“Motion").) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick entered a Report and Recommendation stating that the Court should grant the Motion. (Doc. 27 (“R&R").) The parties did not object and the time has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 27) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety.

2. The Motion (Doc. 26) is GRANTED.

3. The Settlement (Doc. 26-1) is APPROVED.

4. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on June 6, 2024.

ROY B. DALTON, JR.

United States District Judge


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw