NILAJ
v.
MGO LABS, LLC

M.D. Fla. | 2024-05-20
No. 8:23-cv-02671
2024 FFL 11575 District Court, M.D. Florida (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a Clerk's Default against the defendants.


Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiff sued the defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Florida's Minimum Wage Act for unpaid overtime and breach of contract. After …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

I grant Plaintiffs motion for Clerk's Default against Defendants MGO Labs, LLC and DO Enterprises, LLC (Doc. 55).

Plaintiff brings this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Florida's Minimum Wage Act, alleging that Defendants failed to pay him for overtime hours, and breached his employment contract. 2d Am. Compl. (Doc. 44) at 44-68.

After Defendants were served with the Complaint, Padula Bennardo Levine, LLP appeared on their behalf. Docs. 20, 22, 23. But, in March 2023, Defendants' counsel moved to withdraw its representation, citing “irreconcilable differences." Docs. 47, 48, 49. The Court granted the motions to withdraw but noted, “MGO Labs, LLC and DO Enterprises, LLC are corporations that cannot represent themselves in federal court.” Doc. 54; see also Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F. 2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985) (“The rule is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that can act only through agents, cannot appear pro se, and must be represented by counsel.”). Accordingly, the Court ordered MGO Labs and DO Enterprises “to obtain new counsel who must file a notice of appearance on or before April 12, 2024.” Doc. 54. That deadline passed, and no counsel appeared on behalf of MGO Labs and DO Enterprises.

In addition to their failure to obtain new counsel to represent them in this matter, MGO Labs and DO Enterprises have not (timely or otherwise) answered the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 44). They have not responded to Plaintiff's discovery requests. Doc. 56. They have not responded to Plaintiffs motion to compel (Doc. 56). And they did not appear at the Court's show cause hearing on May 20, 2024.

When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default.” FED. R. CIV. P. 55(a).

2

MGO Labs and DO Enterprises have failed to participate in this litigation since the withdrawal of their counsel, and have otherwise demonstrated no intent to defend themselves in this case. An entry of Clerk's default is appropriate.

Accordingly, I ORDER:

(1) Plaintiff's motion for Clerk's Default against Defendants MGO Labs, LLC and DO Enterprises, LLC (Doc. 55) is GRANTED.

(2) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter default against Defendants MGO Labs, LLC and DO Enterprises, LLC.

(3) Pursuant to Local Rule 1.10, Plaintiff shall, within 35 days of entry of the Clerk's Default, apply for the default judgment or file a paper identifying each unresolved issue necessary to entry of the default judgment.

ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on May 20, 2024.

Natalie Hit Adams

NATALIE HIRT ADAMS

United States Magistrate Judge

3


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw