ASHCRAFT
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

M.D. Fla. | 2024-05-17
No. 8:23-cv-00344
District Court, M.D. Florida (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

In this Social Security Administration appeal, the District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted the plaintiff's unopposed motion for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) following the court's February 2024 order reversing the Commissioner's decision and remanding for further proceedings.


Holding

The court granted the plaintiff's motion, awarding attorney's fees of $7,152.00. A party who wins a sentence-four remand order under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) in a Social Security case is a prevailing party entitled to EAJA fees.


Headnotes

[1] A district court need only find no clear error on the face of the record to accept a magistrate judge's recommendation when no party timely objects.

[2] When no party objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, a de novo review is not required.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“a party who wins a sentence-four remand order under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is a prevailing party”

Establishes that obtaining a remand in a Social Security case qualifies one as a prevailing party eligible for EAJA fees

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiff obtained a favorable court order on February 14, 2024, reversing the Commissioner of Social Security's decision and remanding the case f…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

2. Plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of $7,152.00. Unless the Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes a federal debt, the government must pay the fees to Plaintiff's counsel in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment of fees. (Doc. 20). DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on this 17th day of May 2024.

hi 7 Lg dy PW] EY] ANTHONY E. bORCELLI United Sfates Magistrate Judge

cc: Counsel of Record


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw