FRISHBERG
v.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES

M.D. Fla. | 2024-04-23
No. 8:24-cv-22
District Court, M.D. Florida (2024) Positive Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Plaintiff Frishberg sought to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without prepayment of costs. The District Court denied the motion, finding that Frishberg failed to present any nonfrivolous issues for appellate review and did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requirements.


Holding

The Court denied Frishberg's motion to proceed without costs on appeal because he failed to establish a nonfrivolous argument for appellate review and did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure by failing to present the issues he intended to raise on appeal.


Headnotes

[1] A party may not proceed on appeal *in forma pauperis* if the trial court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith.

[2] Good faith requires that an appeal present a nonfrivolous question for review.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“a party may not proceed on appeal in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith”

Establishes the legal standard for denying in forma pauperis status on appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Daniel A. Frishberg, proceeding pro se, filed a motion to proceed on appeal without costs after litigation in the District Court against the Universit…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Daniel A. Frishberg's *pro se* motion to proceed on appeal without costs, filed on April 21, 2024. (Doc. 31).

Under certain circumstances, a party may proceed *in forma pauperis* in federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, which authorizes any court of the United States to allow indigent persons to prosecute, defend, or appeal suits without prepayment of costs. *See, e.g.*, 28 U.S.C. § 1915; *Coppedge v. United States*, 369 U.S. 438, 441 (1962). However, a party may not proceed on appeal *in forma pauperis* if the trial court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Good faith requires that the appeal present a nonfrivolous question for review. *Cruz v. Hauck*, 404 U.S. 59, 62 (1971). If the plaintiff has little or no chance of success, an appeal is frivolous. *Carroll v. Gross*, 984 F. 2d 392, 393 (11th Cir. 1993). An appeal is also frivolous when it is “without arguable merit either in law or fact.” *Bilal v. Driver*, 251 F. 3d 1346, 1349 (11th Cir. 2001).

Plaintiff's motion to appeal without costs fails to establish the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument raised on appeal. In fact, the motion does not present *any* issues that Plaintiff intends to present on appeal as required by Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). He simply asks the Court to permit him to appeal without costs because it permitted him to litigate his underlying case without costs.¹

To the extent that Plaintiff seeks “clarification” as to how to proceed with his appeal, the Court declines to give him legal advice.

The motion to proceed without costs on appeal (Doc. 31) is therefore

DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 23rd of April, 2024.

TOM BARBER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Footnotes
1 In addition, Plaintiff has failed to submit any financial information that would establish he qualifies to proceed without the prepayment of costs at this time.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw