METZ
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

M.D. Fla. | 2024-04-22
No. 2:20-cv-966
2024 FFL 9912 District Court, M.D. Florida (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Andrea Metz's attorney sought attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a successful Social Security benefits award on remand. The district court granted the unopposed motion for $18,768.98 in attorney's fees, representing 25 percent of past-due benefits minus a prior EAJA award.


Holding

The court granted the unopposed motion for attorney's fees. The requested fee of $13,768.98 was both reasonable and appropriate under § 406(b), and the clerk was directed to enter judgment for $18,768.98 in total attorney's fees (accounting for the prior EAJA award treatment).


Key Quotes

“Section 406(b) provides that an attorney who obtains a benefits award on remand may petition for a reasonable fee—not to exceed twenty-five percent of the claimant's past-due benefits—for work performed before the court.”

States the governing statutory standard for attorney's fees in Social Security cases.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Andrea Metz obtained an award of Social Security benefits on remand. Her attorney, Michael A. Steinberg, requested $13,768.98 in attorney's fees under…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

Having obtained an award of benefits, Andrea Metz's attorney, Michael A. Steinberg, seeks attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 32.) Defendant has not opposed the request.

Section 406(b) provides that an attorney who obtains a benefits award on remand may petition for a reasonable fee—not to exceed twenty-five percent of the claimant's past-due benefits—for work performed before the court. Here, Steinberg requests $13,768.98, which is 25 percent of past-due benefits. Steinberg further asserts that the previous EAJA award of $3,598.12 will be returned to Plaintiff. (Doc. 32 at 3); see Paltan v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 519 F. App'x 673, 674 (11th Cir. 2013) (noting that the attorney has the option of either refunding a prior EAJA award to the plaintiff directly or reducing the § 406(b) award by the same amount). For the reasons stated in Metz's

unopposed motion, the requested fee is both reasonable and appropriate under § 406(b).

Accordingly, the unopposed fee motion (Doc. 32) is GRANTED. The clerk will enter judgment for Metz for $13,768.98 in attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on April 22, 2024.

Kyle C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge

Copies: All Parties of Record


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw