NGUYEN
v.
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Plaintiff Nguyen sought judicial review of USCIS's failure to timely adjudicate his naturalization application within 120 days. The district court granted defendants' motion to remand the application back to USCIS for adjudication within 60 days, following the standard procedure when no initial determination has been made by the agency.
The court granted defendants' motion to remand the application to USCIS with instructions to adjudicate within 60 days, finding that remand is the appropriate action when no determination has been made by either an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals.
[1] A district court has jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. …
[2] When a naturalization application has not been determined by an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals, the appropriate action for a district court is to r…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), an applicant can petition the district court if a decision is not made on the applicant's application within 120-days after the applicant's examination.”
Establishes the statutory basis for Plaintiff's suit and the 120-day requirement for USCIS adjudication.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff filed a Form N-400, Application for Naturalization, and waited beyond the 120-day statutory period for USCIS to make a decision. Plaintiff c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Remand To Agency cases and more on FLexlaw
and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Defendants. Case No: 6:24-cv-308-JSS-RMN /
ORDER
Defendants move to remand this matter to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b) for adjudication of Plaintiff's Form N-400, Application for Naturalization (Application). (Motion, Dkt. 10.) Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion. For the reasons explained below, Defendants' Motion (Dkt. 10) is granted.
Plaintiff commenced this action requesting a hearing on the Application due to Defendants' alleged failure to timely adjudicate the Application. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), an applicant can petition the district court if a decision is not made on the applicant's application within 120-days after the applicant's examination. The district court has jurisdiction to either make a determination on the application or remand the application to USCIS, “with appropriate instructions[.]" Id. In cases where a determination has not been made by either an immigration judge or the Board of
Immigration Appeals, the appropriate action is for the district court to remand the application. Sanchez Jimenez v. U.S. Attʼy Gen., 492 F. 3d 1223, 1236 (11th Cir. 2007) (citations omitted); see also I.N.S. v. Orlando Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 17 (2002) (“The agency can bring its expertise to bear upon the matter; it can evaluate the evidence; [and] it can make an initial determination[.]"). The court can then review USCIS's decision to determine whether USCIS exceeded “the leeway that the law provides." Orlando Ventura, 537 U.S. at 17. Here, USCIS has not made a determination on Plaintiff's Application and remand of Plaintiff's Application is therefore appropriate. Accordingly:
1. Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Remand to USCIS (Dkt. 10) is
GRANTED.
2. This matter is REMANDED to USCIS with instructions to adjudicate Plaintiff's Application within 60 days of this order.
3. Within 60 days of adjudication of Plaintiff's Application, the parties shall file a joint stipulation of dismissal or joint motion for the court to re-open the case and enter a scheduling order.
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and deny all pending motions as moot. ORDERED in Orlando, Florida, on April 8, 2024.
JULIE S. SNEED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record