HAMMER BRAND, LLC
v.
VORO INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a clerk's default against the defendant.
Plaintiff moved for a clerk's default against Defendant Amped Adventure LLC. Defendant had previously filed a "Response to Civil Actions Summons" lett…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 55(A) (Entry Of Default) cases and more on FLexlaw
d/b/a WOLF BRAND SCOOTERS,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 8:23-cv-1272-KKM-UAM
VORO INC., et al.
Defendants. ____________________________________/
ORDER
Plaintiff Hammer Brand, LLC moves for entry of clerk’s default against Defendant Amped Adventure LLC. (Doc. 98). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), which governs the entry of default, provides that “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” (emphasis added). However, “[d]efault is to be used sparingly,” as cases should be adjudicated on their merits. Mitchell v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 294 F. 3d 1309, 1316 (11th Cir. 2002). Hammer Brand, LLC moved for a clerk’s default against Amped Adventure LLC on December 18, 2023. (Doc. 98). However, Amped Adventure LLC filed a “Response to Civil Actions Summons” letter on November 11, 2023. (See Doc. 77). Although this letter is not a proper response to the complaint under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, entry of a clerk’s default is not appropriate. See 2007 Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a)
(courts routinely reject default where party shows intent to defend even if not connected with any rule). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: (1) Hammer Brand, LLC’s motion for entry of clerk’s default against
Amped Adventure LLC (Doc. 98) is DENIED. (2) Corporate defendant Amped Adventure LLC is put on notice that a corporation cannot represent itself and must obtain counsel admitted to practice before this court. See Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F. 2d 1381, 1385
(11th Cir. 1985) (“The rule is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that . . . cannot appear pro se and must be represented by counsel.”). Corporate defendant Amped Adventure LLC must retain counsel, who must file a proper response to the complaint by January 31, 2024.
(3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this order to: Gordan Smith, 17191 Bothell Way NE, Unit B102, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on December 19, 2023. Aranda. Arno Sasone_
AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE
United States Magistrate Judge
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Palazzo v. Gulf OIL Corp., 764 F.2d 1381 (11th Cir. 1985)
- Mitchell v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 294 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2002)