STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
v.
DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 35.143.215.105

M.D. Fla. | 2023-12-05
No. 8:23-cv-2416
District Court, M.D. Florida (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sought leave to serve a subpoena on an ISP to identify a subscriber associated with an IP address. The motion was fil…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

subscriber assigned IP address 35.143.215.105,

Defendant. /

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC’s Motion for Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. # 9), filed on November 9, 2023. Upon review of the Motion and the attached Declarations in support, it is now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: 1. Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC’s Motion for Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. # 9) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff has established that “good cause” exists for it to serve a third-party subpoena on Spectrum (hereinafter the “ISP”). See, e.g., Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe, No. 6:15-cv-1987-GAP-TBS, 2015 WL 12938950, at *1

(M.D. Fla. Dec. 3, 2015); Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, No. 8:15- cv-2314-EAK-TBM, 2015 WL 12856086, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 6, 2015).

3. Plaintiff may serve the ISP with a Rule 45 subpoena

commanding the ISP to provide Plaintiff with the true name and address of Defendant to whom the ISP assigned an IP address as set forth in Exhibit A to the Complaint. Plaintiff shall attach to any such subpoena a copy of this Order. 4. If the ISP qualifies as a “cable operator,” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 522(5), which states: the term “cable operator” means any person or group of persons (A) who provides cable service over a cable system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant interest in such cable system, or (B) who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any arrangement, the management and operation of such a cable system.

it shall comply with 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B), which states: A cable operator may disclose such [personal identifying] information if the disclosure is . . . made pursuant to a court order authorizing such disclosure, if the subscriber is notified of such order by the person to whom the order is directed.

by sending a copy of this Order to Defendant.

5. Plaintiff may only use the information disclosed in

response to a Rule 45 subpoena served on the ISP for the purpose of protecting and enforcing Plaintiff’s rights as set

forth in its Complaint. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 5th day of December, 2023.

tn In. Mecmeply (neh VIR IA M. HERNANDEZ’*COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw