MACIAS
v.
HQ MEN'S HAIRCUTS LLC

M.D. Fla. | 2023-11-06
No. 2:22-cv-430
District Court, M.D. Florida (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The court held that a joint stipulation of dismissal filed by all parties in a Fair Labor Standards Act case is effective upon filing under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and requires no further court action.

Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiffs and defendants in this Fair Labor Standards Act case filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Federal Rule of Civil Proce…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Self-Executing Dismissal Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 41(A)(1)(A)(Ii) Voluntary Dismissal Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(a)(ii) Fair Labor Standards Act (Flsa) Claims

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Self-Executing Dismissal cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

The parties have filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. (Doc. 48.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action voluntarily if a stipulation of dismissal is signed by all parties who have appeared. The dismissal is effective on filing and requires no further action by the Court. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F. 3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012).1 The text of the FLSA does not provide, and no Eleventh Circuit decision has ever held, that FLSA claims are exempt from Rule 41. To the contrary, the

as it is unconditional and self-executing.”). Accordingly, this action is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own fees and costs, unless otherwise agreed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment, deny all pending motions, terminate all scheduled events, and close the case. ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this November 6, 2023.

Lote 6. A aslel * Kale C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge Copies: All Parties of Record

Footnotes
1 Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, and alterations have been omitted in this and later citations. Eleventh Circuit has reasoned that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply “in actions brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act no less than in any other case.” Vasconcelo v. Miami Auto Max, Inc., 981 F. 3d 934, 942 (11th Cir. 2020); see also Casso-Lopez v. Beach Time Rental Suncoast, LLC, 335 F.R.D. 458, 461-462 (M.D. Fla. 2020) (holding parties may terminate an FLSA case by filing either a Rule 41 stipulation of dismissal with prejudice or a Rule 68(a) notice of acceptance of an offer of judgment “and the district court is immediately powerless to interfere”); Dicomo v. KJIMS Dev. Co., Inc., No. 2:16- cv-327-FtM-99CM, 2016 WL 6678420, *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 14, 2016) (“[T]he parties may dismiss [an FLSA] case in its entirety pursuant to the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice without further action from the Court

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw