CAMPBELL

v.

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (LEE)

Before the Court is Petitioner Remoi Campbell’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 1). Campbell was convicted of aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and is serving a prison sentence in the Florida Department of Corrections. The Court reviews Campbell’s petition under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The Antiterrorism Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) governs this action. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Federal habeas relief may be granted only on a claim adjudicated on the merits in state court if the adjudication: (1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). This standard is both mandatory and difficult to meet. White v. Woodall, 134 S. Ct. 1697, 1702 (2014). Campbell’s Petition must be dismissed for two reasons. First, even when construed liberally, the Petition does not allege any grounds for federal habeas

relief. It mostly consists of stream-of-consciousness musings about Campbell’s life. In the most relevant part of the Petition, Campbell expresses regret that he rejected a plea deal. That is not a valid basis for habeas relief. Campbell is plainly not entitled to habeas relief based on any claims in the Petition, so the

Court will dismiss it. See Section 2254 Rule 4 (“If it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must dismiss the petition[.]” Second, the Petition does not demonstrate that Campbell has exhausted

any post-conviction claims in state court. AEDPA precludes federal courts, absent exceptional circumstances, from granting habeas relief unless a petitioner has exhausted all means of relief available under state law. Failure to exhaust occurs “when a petitioner has not ‘fairly presented’ every issue

raised in his federal petition to the state’s highest court, either on direct appeal or on collateral review.” Pope v. Sec’y for Dep’t. of Corr., 680 F. 3d 1271, 1284 (11th Cir. 2012) (quoting Mason v. Allen, 605 F. 3d 1114, 1119 (11th Cir. 2010)). Campbell was convicted in 2017, so Florida’s statute of limitations might preclude Campbell from seeking state post-conviction relief in state court. Nevertheless, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice to allow Campbell to exhaust any federal habeas claim in state court. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Remoi Campbells’ Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any motions and deadlines, enter judgment, and close this case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on October 13, 2023.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SA: FTMP-1 Copies: All Parties of Record