UNITED STATES
v.
SHANDLES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting the United States' motion for default judgment against the defendants.
The Magistrate Judge recommended granting the United States' motion for default judgment. No party objected to the report within the fourteen-day dead…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Federal Income Tax Liability cases and more on FLexlaw
On September 19, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation, recommending that Plaintiff United States’ Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 16) be granted. The fourteen-day deadline to object to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation has passed without any party lodging an objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); FED. R. CIV. P. 6(d). Considering the record, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation for the reasons stated therein and grants the United States’ motion. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If a party files a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact by a magistrate judge, the district court must conduct a de novo review with respect to that factual issue. , 952 F. 2d 1567, 1576 (11th Cir. 1992). The district court reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. , 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); , 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2019).
In the absence of any objection and after reviewing the factual allegations and legal conclusions, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. In the light of Ira Shandles’s and Elizabeth Shandles’s defaults, it is undisputed (1) that Ira and Elizabeth
Shandles jointly owe $232,043.79 as of August 10, 2023 for their 2011 federal income tax liability, plus interest and statutory additions that continue to accrue, and (2) that Ira Shandles individually owes $1,064,441.01 as of August 10, 2023, for his 2012-2018 federal income tax liabilities, plus interest and statutory additions that continue to accrue. R&R at 2–5. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is
ADOPTED and made a part of this Order for all purposes. 2. United States’ Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, the United States of America, and against Defendants Ira and Elizabeth Shandles jointly in the amount of $232,043.79, plus statutory interest pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6621, 6622 and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c), accruing from August 10, 2023, until paid. 4, The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, the United States of America, and against Defendant Ira Shandles in the amount of $1,095,493.30, plus statutory interest pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6621, 6622 and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c), accruing from August 10, 2023, until paid. 5. The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any remaining deadlines. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on October 23, 2023.
athryn’Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Durham Eldon Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567 (11th Cir. 1992)
- Brannigan v. Anthem Ins. Cos., Inc., 2019 WL 5393817 (M.D. Fla. 2019)