HARBORVIEW REALTY, INC.
v.
FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a motion to compel discovery filed after the discovery deadline has passed is untimely and must be denied.
Plaintiffs moved to compel updated discovery responses and the deposition of a new witness after the discovery deadline had closed. They also filed a …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Untimely Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
Plaintiffs Harborview Realty, Inc. and McGregor Real Estate, Inc. move to compel updated discovery responses from Defendant Fifth Third Bank, National Association. (Doc. 44 ¶ 37.)1 They also ask for an order “compelling [Fifth Third Bank to] agree to the deposition” of a new fact witness. (Id.) Plaintiffs’ motion is opposed, but the Court need not await a response to dispose of it. For the reasons below, the motion to compel is denied. The problem for Plaintiffs is simple, their request is untimely. Discovery closed on September 30, 2023, which is several days before the pending motion was filed. (See Doc. 42.) “This district follows the rule that the completion date
A motion to compel filed after the discovery deadline is thus dead on arrival. See El-Saba v. Univ. of S. Alabama, 738 F. App’x 640, 645 (11th Cir. 2018) (affirming denial of a motion to compel as untimely where it “was filed almost two weeks after” discovery closed); Eli Rsch., LLC v. Must Have Info Inc., No. 2:18-CV-695-FTM-38CM, 2015 WL 4694046, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 6, 2015) (denying motion to compel filed three days after discovery closed).
Plaintiffs have also moved to extend the discovery deadline. (See Doc. 43.) If discovery is reopened, Plaintiffs can (and should) refile their motion to compel. But until that occurs, this discovery dispute is a nonstarter. See, e.g., Govt Emps. Ins. Co. v. Merced, No. 8:20-CV-802-KKM-AAS, 2022 WL 218485, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2022).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (Doc. 44) is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
ENTERED in Fort Myers, Florida on October 3, 2023.
i oe . 4 ECL Lact Kile C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge