SHM REGATTA POINTE, LLC
v.
S/V SEA DREAMS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that default judgment against the Vessel is appropriate and granted the motion for default judgment.
Plaintiff moved for default judgment against a vessel after no response was filed. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting the motion, and the parti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Credit Bid cases and more on FLexlaw
3. The Clerk is directed to enter a FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of SHM Regatta Pointe, LLC, and against S/V Sea Dreams in the amount
of $7,713.33; expenses in the amount of $23,280.00 for services provided to the Vessel from March 23, 2023, through June 30, 2023; $233.86 per day for services provided to the Vessel from July 1, 2023, to the date the
Vessel is released from arrest; and expenses for services provided by the U.S. Marshals Services in the amount of $2,500.00, plus pre- judgment interests under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 4. The U.S. Marshall is directed to conduct the sale of the Vessel, her engines,
tackle, apparel, furniture, equipment, appurtenances, and all other necessaries thereunto appertaining and belonging to the Vessel, in accordance with Rule E(9) of the Supplemental Admiralty Rules and the Local Admiralty and Maritime Practice Manual 5(r). 5. SHM Regatta Pointe, LLC, is permitted to credit bid its judgment at the public sale of the Vessel.
6. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.
ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on October 2, 2023.
= ‘mph Mizelle United States District Judge
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marina Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244 (M.D. Fla. 2019)