DURKIN
v.
HUD PINELLAS COUNTY

M.D. Fla. | 2023-09-11
No. 8:23-cv-1594
District Court, M.D. Florida (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The Court adopts the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, denying the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the complaint without prejudice, with leave to amend.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff filed a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The magistrate judge recommended denying the motion and dismissing the complain…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2) and the complaint (Dkt. 1). The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the motion be denied without prejudice and that the complaint be dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. Dkt. 6. The time for filing objections has passed. The Court reviews the legal conclusions de novo in the absence of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 F. App’x 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted); Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994). The magistrate judge, in a thorough analysis, found that the complaint (Dkt. 1) does not satisfy basic pleading requirements in both form and factual allegations. For the reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation, and in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 6) should be adopted as part of this order, confirmed, and approved in all respects. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 6) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and made a part of this order. 2. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2) is denied without prejudice. 3. Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. 1) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, if so desired, in accordance with the Report and Recommendation within twenty (20) days. The amended complaint must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, must set forth allegations in numbered paragraphs limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances, and must state in a separate count each claim founded on a separate transaction or occurrence. If an amended complaint is not timely filed, this matter will be closed without further notice. 4. The motion to cease and desist (Dkt. 7) is unrelated to this lawsuit and is therefore denied. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on September 11, 2023. ME:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

COPIES FURNISHED TO: Plaintiff


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw