THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCISCO CANO, A/K/A PACO CANO, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1988-07-19
No. 88-294
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
529 So. 2d 762 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s sentence outside of the guidelines is reversed because it is not accompanied by the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla.1985); Vidal v. State, 516 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw