MCKENZIE
v.
UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to file a deposition transcript under seal.
The plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a deposition transcript under seal. The motion was related to a discovery dispute implicating the attor…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Eleventh Circuit Standard For Sealing cases and more on FLexlaw
and USTA PLAYER DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED,
Defendants
ORDER
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT UNDER SEAL (Doc. No. 67) FILED: August 15, 2023
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Upon review, given that this is a discovery-related dispute that implicates the attorney-client privilege, having considered Local Rule 1.11 and the Eleventh Circuit’s standard for sealing, as well as Defendants’ lack of objection, the Court finds good cause for the deposition transcript (or excerpts thereof) to be filed under seal. See generally Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F. 3d 1304, 1312 (11th Cir. 2001) (“[Mlaterial filed with discovery motions is not subject to the common-law right of access... .”). Accordingly, the motion (Doc. No. 67) is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file the deposition transcript (or excerpts thereof) under seal no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 17, 2023. After review of the documents, the Court
may require that some or all of the information filed under seal be filed in the public record, if it determines that the transcript is not properly subject to sealing. Otherwise, this seal shall not extend beyond ninety (90) days after the case is closed and all appeals exhausted. See Local Rule 1.11(f). DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on August 16, 2023.
LESLIE NOFFMAN PRICE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2001)