MCGARRITY
v.
FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, INC.

M.D. Fla. | 2023-08-16
No. 8:23-cv-776
District Court, M.D. Florida (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted the plaintiff's motion to remand, declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims after all federal claims were dismissed.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff initially filed a survival action in state court, later amended the complaint to include federal claims, leading to removal by defendants. A…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

personal representative of the estate of Ann M. McGarrity,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:23-cv-776-WFJ-JSS

FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES

CENTER, INC., d/b/a TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL; ABIGAIL JACKSON, R.N.; ASHLEY BOYT, R.N.; NICOLA CRAIG, R.N.;

FLORIDA GULF-TO-BAY

ANESTHESIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.; LACINDA MICHELLE DENIS, P.A.; BRIAN BOLT, A.R.N.P.; PREMIER HOSPITALISTS, PL; YASMIN KHALDOUN MAHMOUD, M.D.; DOUGLAS SCHWARTZ, D.O.; and MICHAEL FRANKS, A.R.N.P.,

Defendants. _________________________________/

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Margaret McGarrity’s Second Motion to Remand to State Court (Dkt. 34). Defendants have filed notice of non-objection (Dkts. 36, 42, 45, 46). Upon careful consideration, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion and remands this action back to the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida.

BACKGROUND

On February 24, 2018, Ann M. McGarrity died after receiving medical treatment from Defendants. See generally Dkt. 39. Plaintiff subsequently initiated a survival action against Defendants in the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida. Dkt. 6-3 at 2–68. On March 2, 2023,

Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint that included three federal law claims against Defendant Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc. (the “Hospital”). Dkt. 6-1 at 33–40. On April 10, 2023, Defendants removed the instant action to this Court. Dkts.

Motion to Remand, finding that Defendants’ removal was indeed timely, and that Plaintiff had not yet abandoned her federal law claims. Dkt. 24. On August 9, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint dropping all federal counts against the Hospital. Dkt. 39. Plaintiff now moves to remand back to state court for the second time. Dkt. 34. Defendants offer no opposition.

DISCUSSION

As the Court noted in its previous remand order, a district court may decline to continue exercising its supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims when all federal claims have been dismissed or abandoned. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); Pintando v. Miami-Dade Hous. Agency, 501 F. 3d 1241, 1242 (11th Cir. 2007); Behlen v. Merrill Lynch, 311 F. 3d 1087, 1095 (11th Cir. 2002). District courts, moreover, are encouraged to refrain from exercising said jurisdiction where all federal claims have been eliminated prior to trial. See Raney v. Allstate Ins. Co., 370 F. 3d 1086, 1089 (11th Cir. 2004). Here, all of Plaintiff’s federal law claims have been eliminated prior to the summary judgment stage. Defendants do not oppose remand. The Court therefore declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s remaining state law claims. The instant action is remanded to state court.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED: (1) Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Remand (Dkt. 34) is GRANTED.

(2) This action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida. (3) The Clerk is directed to effectuate remand and close this case. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on August 16, 2023.

/s/ William F. Jung

WILLIAM F. JUNG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of Record

Footnotes
1 & 6. Plaintiff filed her First Motion to Remand approximately two weeks later— arguing that Defendants’ removal was untimely and that no federal question jurisdiction existed. Dkt. 15. On May 23, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff’s First

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw