ROOSEVELT SYLVESTER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
After accepting the defendant’s guilty plea, the trial court placed the defendant on probation for five years with the condition that he serve 51 weeks in the County Jail. The trial court expressly found that the defendant served 46 days in county jail prior to adjudication, but declined to grant him jail time credit. To the extent that the order of probation denies such credit, we reverse and remand with directions to allow the defendant credit for 46 days served in county jail. Kemp v. State, 526 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Griner v. State, 523 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ORFINGER, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pyszka v. Mullin, 602 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…80 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(c). The disclosure of information delineating the partners’ financial situations unnecessarily violates their privacy rights. See Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, 199 So. 2d 97, 98 (Fla.1967); Bradstreet v. Taraschi, 529 So. 2d 809, 810 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Palmer v. Servis, 393 So. 2d 653, 655 (Fla. 5th DCA [*956] 1981). In determining whether to limit the scope of discovery to protect a person’s right of privacy, the trial court must balance the relevant competing interests.…
-
2245 Venetian Court Bldg. 4, Inc. v. William and Margaret Harrison, 149 So. 3d 1176 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…olved either as an owner or officer with several of the Venetian entities even after the judgment was obtained. . Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douberley, P.A. v. Mullin, 602 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), Bradstreet v. Taraschi, 529 So. 2d 809, 810 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), and Palmer v. Servís, 393 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), are prejudgment discovery cases which require more narrowly tailored discovery requests and which do not involve the same considerations as postjudgment discovery ca…
-
Rosen v. Rosen, 655 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…urt that the requested access to the financial records of the husband and his mother may lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as to the husband’s income and assets. See Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, 199 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1967); Bradstreet v. Taraschi, 529 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Smith v. Bloom, 506 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). We therefore reverse the order and remand the cause for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment as to the dissolution of the parties’ ma…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Griner v. State, 523 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
- Kemp v. State, 526 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)