LEWIS
v.
OPG SECURITY LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the motion for clerk's default without prejudice.
Plaintiffs moved for a clerk's default against the defendant, asserting the defendant was served and failed to respond. The court reviewed the motion …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Memorandum Of Legal Authority cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: MOTION FOR CLERKS DEFAULT (Doc. No. 13) FILED: August 7, 2023
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs move for Clerk’s default against Defendant, stating that Defendant was served on July 7, 2023, and has failed to appear otherwise defend. Doc. No. 13. See also Doc. No. 11. Upon review, however, the motion will be denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.01(a). Relatedly, the motion fails to adequately address, with citation to legal authority, that service of process on Defendant was proper under governing law. See generally United States v. Donald, No. 3:09-cv-147-J-32HTS, 2009 WL 1810357, at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 24, 2009) (before a Clerk’s default can be entered against a defendant, the Court must determine that the defendant was properly served). A renewed motion, which shall be filed on or before August 22, 2023, must include a memorandum of legal authority establishing that service of process was proper under applicable law. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on August 8, 2023.
LESLIE 3 AN PRICE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties