SCOMA CHIROPRACTIC, P.A.
v.
NATIONAL SPINE AND PAIN CENTERS LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the motion for reconsideration because the movant failed to establish grounds for such relief, specifically clear error or manifest injustice.
Plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the court's prior order, arguing the court failed to properly consider e-mailed fax log evidence. The court had…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Burden Of Proof At Trial cases and more on FLexlaw
The Court is mindful of the great expense that the parties would face should this case proceed to trial. Given the present posture of this case, the Court encourages the parties to pursue settlement negotiations in lieu of further litigation. See Murchison v. Grand Cypress Hotel Corp., 13 F. 3d 1483, 1486 (11th Cir. 1994) (explaining that courts “favor and encourage settlements in order to conserve judicial resources’). The Court will notice a status conference by separate order to discuss whether Scoma desires to proceed with its jury trial demand. ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida on June 22, 2023.
PLS thither
JOHN L. BADALAMENTI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (U.S. 1986)
- Burger King Corp. v. Ashland Equities, Inc., 2002 WL 92806 (S.D. Fla. 2002)
- Reese v. Herbert, 527 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2008)
- Murchison v. Grand Cypress Hotel Corp., 13 F.3d 1483 (11th Cir. 1994)