ALFRED RUSSELL, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Moon v. Moon, 594 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …5. Growth of premarital profit sharing plan assets attributable to marital efforts, if any, such as investment decisions. Depending upon the evidence, this category may or may not become a factor in the trial court’s analysis. See Turner v. Turner, 529 So. 2d 1138, 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (“[T]he enhanced value of separately owned assets becomes a marital asset when that enhanced value is due to marital labor or funds. Once the threshold requirement of marital labor or funds has been established, increases i…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Gussie Hanks v. Hanks, 553 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …me was in part a non-marital asset because of its purchase prior to the marriage, but the value of its enhancement and improvement subsequent to the marriage must be treated as marital assets for purposes of equitable distribution. Turner v. Turner, 529 So. 2d 1138, 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Furthermore the wife must be credited for her contributions both by her work in the business as well as her contributions as a wife throughout the course of the marriage. Buttner v. Buttner, 484 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 1…
• Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So. 2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …oss-appeal takes issue with the award of attorney’s fees. We reverse the final judgment because it is riddled with inconsistencies and incongruities.1 The confused state of the final judgment precludes meaningful appellate review. Turner v. Turner, 529 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In addition, we find that the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to reserve jurisdiction to award the wife alimony in the future. Noah v. Noah, 491 So. 2d 1124 (Fla.1986); Langer v. Langer, 463 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 3…