LINDBERG
v.
LACORTE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to deny the plaintiff's motion to appeal in forma pauperis because the appeal was not taken in good faith.
Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint, which was dismissed. Over a year later, she moved to appeal in forma pauperis. A Magistrate Judge recommended deny…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clear Error Standard Of Review cases and more on FLexlaw
Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendants. (Doc. 1.) Over a year after the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint, she moved to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 12; Doc. 15 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends the Court deny the Motion because the appeal is not taken in good faith. (Doc. 20 (“R&R”).) The time has passed and there were no objections, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
2. Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 15) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s appeal is not taken in good faith. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to notify the Eleventh Circuit of this Order in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4).
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on May 22, 2023. aj 2 A) “ROY B. di LTON TR United States District Judge