GEORGE ENGLISH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in scoring unverified prior convictions on the appellant's guidelines scoresheet, requiring reversal of the sentence.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated child abuse and objected to the scoring of unverified Canadian felonies at sentencing. The trial court included …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prior Record Scoring cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, George English, challenges the judgment and sentence imposed upon him after he was found guilty of aggravated child abuse. We find no error in connection with appellant’s conviction and, accordingly, affirm the judgment. We agree, however, with the appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in scoring unverified prior convictions on the appellant’s guidelines scoresheet.
After a jury found the appellant guilty of aggravated child abuse, the trial court adjudicated him guilty of this offense. At the sentencing hearing, the appellant objected to the scoring of certain Canadian felonies contained in the presentence investigation report. Despite the appellant’s objection, the trial court did not require the state to verify the alleged Canadian convictions. These offenses were scored as prior record, and the appellant was sentenced to seven years imprisonment within the guidelines range. This timely appeal followed.
Since the appellant contested the Canadian felonies, the trial court improperly included them as prior record on the appellant’s scoresheet without requiring the state to establish their veracity. See Davis v. State, 463 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Vandeneynden v. State, 478 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). See also, Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1980). Scoring the disputed convictions placed the appellant in a higher guidelines sentencing range and, therefore, constitutes reversible error. Davis.
We, accordingly, reverse the appellant's sentence and remand for resentencing. At resentencing, if the state is unable to verify the disputed convictions, the trial court must strike them from the appellant’s guidelines scoresheet.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Montague v. State, 656 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…t of victim injury as to each count, after which the trial court may reassess victim injury points if appropriate. Accord Wilson v. State, 648 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); cf. Kalina v. State, 596 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); English v. State, 529 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (guidelines scoresheet to be recalculated on remand to reflect prior convictions state could verify). To assist the trial court in this determination, we specifically hold that pregnancy followed by a miscarriage resulting from a…
-
Ruth v. State, 574 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…l outside the five-year window. Since Mr. Ruth objected to the truth of the state’s documentary evidence, it was incumbent upon the state to obtain certified copies of the judgments or otherwise verify the prior felony convictions. English v. State, 529 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Wright v. State, 476 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Vance v. State, 545 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 551 So. 2d 463 (Fla.1989). Reversed and remanded. DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur. . This motion also alle…
-
Kalina v. State, 596 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…the appellant’s arguments relating to his conviction for armed robbery, and we affirm the judgment. As to the sentence, the state did not prove disputed foreign convictions scored as prior record, and the state concedes error. See English v. State, 529 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Thus, we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. The guidelines score must be recalculated to reflect prior convictions that the state can verify. On remand the trial court may impose a departure sentence if there is a…
Authorities Cited
- Fredford James Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1980)
- Vandeneynden v. State, 478 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
- Davis v. State, 463 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)