MATERO
v.
DIGITAL INK AMERICAS LLC

M.D. Fla. | 2023-03-15
No. 16
District Court, M.D. Florida (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that service of process on an "Office Manager" was sufficient under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(1)(B).

Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiff sought a clerk's default against the defendant, asserting proper service was made on February 9, 2023, by serving "Rose Garcia Office Ma…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Clerk'S Default

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clerk'S Default cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF LAW (Doc. No. 16) FILED: March 13, 2023

THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed1 motion for Clerk’s default against Defendant. Doc. No. 16. In support, Plaintiff states that Defendant was “properly served with a summons and a copy of the Complaint” on February 9, 2023. Id. ¶

8. The return of service demonstrates that service was effected on February 9, 2023 by serving “Rose Garcia Office Manager.” Doc. No. 13. Thus, Plaintiff says that he “properly served Defendant by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the managing or general agent at Defendant’s principal and mailing address registered with the Division of Corporations for the State of Florida,” in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(1)(B). Doc. No. 16, at 3.2 Upon review, Plaintiff has not demonstrated that service of process was proper. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(1)(B) provides that service of process on a business association may be effected “by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B). Plaintiff provides no legal authority demonstrating that service

LESLIE NOFFMAN PRICE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
Footnotes
1 The Court denied Plaintiff’s first motion for Clerk’s default against Defendant without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.01(a) and address whether service of process on Defendant was proper. Doc. Nos. 14–15. 2 Notably, despite Plaintiff’s contention that service was effected at Defendant’s principal address, see Doc. No. 16, the return of service does not state the address at which service was effected, see Doc. No. 13. on “Rose Garcia Office Manager” would suffice under Rule 4(h)(1)(B). Cf Hess Corp. v. Fla.-Georgia Trucking, Inc., No. 3:08-cv-883-J-34TEM, 2009 WL 248236, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 30, 2009) (“Even if it is assumed, in arguendo, that Mr. Walton was employed by Defendant, his position as office manager does not fit in any of the categories prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B).”). Cf also Cohan v. Cape Canaveral Foods Grp. LLC, No. 6:21-cv-1801-ACC-GJK, 2022 WL 1289336, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2022) (vacating Clerk’s default where failure to demonstrate that service of process on office manager of LLC defendant was sufficient to comply with Florida law, Fla. Stat. § 48.062); Vibe Ener v. Duckenfield, No. 20-CV-22886-UU, 2020 WL 6373419, at *7 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 29, 2020) (service of process on an office manager of LLC insufficient under both federal and Florida law). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED without prejudice. A renewed motion, which shall be filed on or before March 28, 2023, must establish, with citation to applicable legal authority, that service of process on Defendant was proper under governing law. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on March 15, 2023.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw