MISAMORE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the plaintiff's petition for attorney fees under the EAJA, awarding $4,094.02.
Plaintiff sought attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) after prevailing in a prior action. The defendant did not object to the re…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anti-Assignment Act cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. No. 31; “Petition”), filed December 16, 2022. In the Petition, Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) in the amount of $4,311.55. Petition at 1, 3; see also Affidavits of Plaintiff’s Former and Current Counsel (Doc. No. 31 at pp. 5-6, 7-8; collectively, “Affidavits”). Although the Petition represents that Defendant opposes the relief requested, Defendant responded on January 31, 2023 indicating she “does not object to Plaintiff’s request for $4,311.55 in attorney’s fees” and that the Commissioner will determine at a later date whether to waive the Anti- Assignment Act provisions. Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Doc. No. 33).
According to the Petition, Plaintiff’s counsel expended a total of 19.80 hours in the representation of Plaintiff before the Court. Id. at 3; Itemizations of Services Rendered (Doc. Nos. 31-1, 31-2). Plaintiff requests an hourly rate of $217.54 for hours in 2021 and $231.49 for hours in 2022. Petition at 3. Plaintiff is seeking a higher hourly rate than the $125 specified by statute based on the increase in the cost of living since 1996, when the attorney’s fee rate was last adjusted by Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (permitting fee awards at rates higher than $125 per hour upon the Court’s determination that cost of living has increased). Having examined the Consumer Price Index and the representations made in the Petition, the Court concludes an increase in inflation does justify a proportionate increase in attorney’s fees.1 Further, the number of hours expended is reasonable.
Plaintiff has assigned his rights to any entitlement of attorney’s fees due under the EAJA to his former counsel. See Assignment of EAJA Fees (Doc. No. 31-3). Regarding the assignment, Plaintiff represents the following:
After the Court issues an order awarding EAJA fees, the Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. Any payments shall be made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel unless Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt. If the United States Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt the government will accept . . . Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA form and pay fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel.
Petition at 3. It is unclear whether that representation is meant to apply to Plaintiffs current or former counsel or both. In any event, the Court will leave it to the Commissioner’s sole discretion to determine whether to accept the assignment.
Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. No. 31) is GRANTED to the extent that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,094.02 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).2 2. The Commissioner has the sole discretion to determine whether to honor Plaintiffs assignment of fees to counsel.
3. Otherwise, the Motion is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida on February 3, 2023.
Trewin Boo K Reel
JAMES R. KLINDT
United States Magistrate Judge
kaw Copies: Counsel of Record