ANDERSON
v.
THE CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH MUNICIPAL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the plaintiff's motion because the case had already been dismissed and closed, and the motion failed to comply with local rules.
The plaintiff, appearing pro se, filed a motion related to the False Claims Act in a case that had been dismissed and closed. The court had previously…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Local Court Rules cases and more on FLexlaw
CLAIMS ACT (FCA), 41 U.S.C. 31 3729(b), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 - 3733 (Doc. No. 45) FILED: January 18, 2023 THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. Before the Court is a motion by Plaintiff, who appears pro se, titled “Motion Qui Tam the False Claims Act, the Relator are Filed Under Seal False Claims Act (FCA), 41 U.S.C. 31 3729(b), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 - 3733.” Doc. No. 45. Upon review of the motion and the docket, the motion will be DENIED because this case was dismissed without prejudice on December 27, 2022, and the case has been closed. See Doc. No. 37. See also Doc. Nos. 39, 42 (denying motions to reopen case); Doc. No. 44 (striking similar filing by Plaintiff, which was construed as an attempt to file
an amended complaint, because the case is closed). Even if the Court were to consider the motion - and Plaintiff has provided no legal authority authorizing the Court to consider said motion in a closed case - the motion fails to comply with the Local Rules, including Local Rules 1.08, 3.01(a), and 3.01(g). See also Moon v. Newsome, 863 F. 2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989) (stating that pro se litigants are “subject to the relevant law and rules of court, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”). DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on January 20, 2023.
[ inlay ie an 10
LESLIE NOFFIIAN PRICE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties