BOWEN
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees under the EAJA, awarding $5,117.67.
Plaintiff sought attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) after prevailing in a Social Security matter. The requested fees were ba…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Assignment Of Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. No. 36; “Motion”), filed November 7, 2022.1 In the Motion, Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) in the amount of $5,123.80. Motion at 1; see also Invoice (Doc. No. 36-1); Plaintiff’s Attorney’s Affidavit Supporting Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. No. 36-3; “Affidavit”). Defendant does not oppose the relief requested. See Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the
According to the Motion and supporting documentation, Plaintiff’s counsel expended a total of 23.97 hours in the representation of Plaintiff before the Court: 19.95 hours in 2021 and 4.02 hours in 2022. See Motion; Invoice. Plaintiff requests an hourly rate of $213 for hours expended in 2021 and $216 for hours expended in 2022. Motion at 1. Plaintiff is seeking a higher hourly rate than the $125 specified by statute based on the increase in the cost of living since 1996, when the attorney’s fee rate was last adjusted by Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (permitting fee awards at rates higher than $125 per hour upon the Court’s determination that cost of living has increased). Having examined the Consumer Price Index and the representations made in the Motion, the Court concludes an increase in inflation does justify a proportionate increase in attorney’s fees.2 Further, the number of hours expended is reasonable. Plaintiff has assigned his rights to any entitlement of attorney’s fees due under the EAJA to his counsel. See Plaintiff’s Affidavit and Assignment of
Verge Boo KAS
JAMES R. KLINDT
United States Magistrate Judge
kaw Copies to: Counsel of Record