GRIFFIN
v.
WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Plaintiff is entitled to attorneys' fees as the prevailing party in this Fair Labor Standards Act case.
The parties settled the Fair Labor Standards Act case, and the court entered final judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff then moved for at…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Local Rule 7.01 cases and more on FLexlaw
This Fair Labor Standards Act case is before the Court on Plaintiff Thomas Griffin’s Unopposed Motion for Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees. (Doc. 49). On October 20, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price issued a report and recommendation informing the Court that the parties had agreed to settle this case following an October 19, 2020 settlement conference. (Doc. 40). Magistrate Judge Hoffman Price recommended that the Court approve the settlement agreement. Id. On November 9, 2022, the Court adopted the report and recommendation, approved the settlement agreement, and the Clerk entered final judgment in favor of Griffin against Defendant Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. on November 14, 2022. (Docs. 44, 47). Griffin now moves the Court to determine whether he is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs against Waste Pro pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and Local Rule 7.01. (Doc. 49).
Local Rule 7.01’s bifurcated attorneys’ fees procedure requires parties to first demonstrate an entitlement to attorneys’ fees before filing a supplemental motion on amount. Local Rule 7.01(a), (b). “Section 216(b) of the [FLSA] makes fee awards mandatory for prevailing plaintiffs.” Laney v. BBB Logistics, Inc.,
844 F. App’x 203, 207 (11th Cir. 2021)1 (quoting Kreager v. Solomon & Flanagan, P.A., 775 F. 2d 1541, 1542 (11th Cir. 1985)). A party prevails when he obtains either a judgment on the merits or a consent decree. Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va. Dep’t of Health and Hum. Res., 532 U.S. 598,
605 (2011); Cf. Jones v. Waste Pro USA, Inc., No. 6:22-cv-503-GAP-DCI, 2022 WL 4348584, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2022), report and recommendation adopted, 2022 WL 4305923 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2022) (discussing how plaintiffs prevail when accepting settlements through offers of judgment). Here, the
Court approved the parties’ settlement agreement and entered final judgment in favor of Griffin against Waste Pro, and Waste Pro does not contest Griffin’s entitlement to attorney’s fees. (Docs. 44, 47, 49).
Oa > Cimotheg 9. Corrig an
TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN
= United States District Judge
rmv Copies to: Counsel of record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- McNamara v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 30 F.4th 1055 (11th Cir. 2022)
- Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va. Dep't of Health & Human Res., 532 U.S. 598 (U.S. 2001)
- Kreager v. Solomon & Flanagan, P.A., 775 F.2d 1541 (11th Cir. 1985)