SIMPSON
v.
WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, approving the settlement as fair and reasonable.
Plaintiff James C. Simpson, Sr. and Defendant Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. reached a settlement in their dispute. The Magistrate Judge reviewed the sett…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #23), filed November 14, 2022, recommending that the settlement appears to be fair, adequate, and a reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute between the parties. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo,
even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F. 3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table). After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #23) is hereby adopted, and the findings incorporated herein. 2. The parties' Joint Brief in Support of Approval of
Settlement (Doc. #22) is granted, and the Settlement Agreement and Release (Doc. #22-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.
3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with
prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.
4. Counsel shall file a motion for attorney fees that
complies with Local Rule 7.01(b) within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the entry of judgment. DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this Ist day of December 2022.
/ — VAM Z~ DH
JGHH E. STEELE
SHNIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: Hon. Nicholas P. Mizell United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record Unrepresented parties
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 (11th Cir. 1993)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 1993 WL 259424 (S.D. Fla. 1993)
- Williams v. Wainwright, 459 U.S. 1112 (U.S. 1983)