WEXLER
v.
TORRES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint without prejudice, allowing plaintiff one final opportunity to amend.
Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint alleging constitutional violations and moved to proceed in forma pauperis. The Magistrate Judge recommended dismiss…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dismissal Without Prejudice cases and more on FLexlaw
Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint alleging constitutional violations and moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 1; Doc. 2 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price recommends dismissing the Complaint without prejudice and allowing Plaintiff to amend, provided he can correct several deficiencies with his original pleading.1 (Doc. 18 (“R&R”).) Neither party objected to the R&R, so the Court examines it for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted
Defendants. See David Wayne Gizmo Wexler v. Georgie Torres, et al., No. 6:21-cv-887, Doc. Nos. 1, 47 (M.D. Fla.). Plaintiff is warned that an amended complaint failing to comply with the directives outlined in the R&R may be dismissed with prejudice. Garcia v. Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc., 48 F. 4th 1202, 1220 (11th Cir. 2022) (Leave to amend is not necessary where there is “repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed . . . or where amendment would be futile.”).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 18) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
2. Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 2) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
4. By Monday, November 21, 2022, Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in the R&R (Doc. 18) and a renewed in forma pauperis motion. Failure to timely file will result in the file being closed without further notice. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on November 9, 2022.
OY bs a ROY B. DALTON JR’ United States District Judge
Copies: Pro se Plaintiff David Wayne Gizmo Wexler