HILL
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted Plaintiff's unopposed petition for attorney fees under the EAJA.
Plaintiff sought attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) for representation in a Social Security case. The requested amount was $7,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Cost Of Living Adjustment For Attorney Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. No. 33; “Petition”), filed November 3, 2022.1 In the Petition, Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) in the amount of $7,650.72. Petition at 1, 3; see also Affidavit of Plaintiff’s Counsel (Doc. No. 33 pp. 5-6; “Affidavit”). Defendant does not oppose the relief requested. See Petition at 2; Affidavit at 2. According to the Petition and supporting documentation, Plaintiff’s counsel expended a total of 33.6 hours in the representation of Plaintiff before the Court: 5.6 hours in 2021 and 28 hours in 2022. Petition at 3; Itemization of
Petition at 3. Plaintiff is seeking a higher hourly rate than the $125 specified by statute based on the increase in the cost of living since 1996, when the attorney’s fee rate was last adjusted by Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (permitting fee awards at rates higher than $125 per hour upon the Court’s
determination that cost of living has increased). Having examined the Consumer Price Index and the representations made in the Petition, the Court concludes an increase in inflation does justify a proportionate increase in attorney’s fees.2 Further, the number of hours expended is reasonable.
Plaintiff has assigned her rights to any entitlement of attorney’s fees due under the EAJA to her counsel. See Assignment of EAJA Fees (Doc. No. 33-2). Regarding the assignment, Plaintiff represents the following: After [t]he Court issues an order awarding EAJA fees, the Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. Any payments shall be made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel unless Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt. If the United States Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt the government may accept . . . Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA form and pay fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel.
GRANTED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,650.72 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 3. The Commissioner may exercise the discretion to honor Plaintiffs assignment of fees to counsel if the U.S. Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the U.S. Government. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida on November 4, 2022.
amare KR. KAcacdt
JAMES R. KLINDT
United States Magistrate Judge
kaw Copies to: Counsel of Record