ALVIN CARROLL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1988-09-01
No. 87-1368
ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.
530 So. 2d 454 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Alvin Carroll appeals his convictions and sentences for ten offenses, challenging the trial court's classification of two felony offenses on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. The court agreed that burglary of a dwelling with battery and kidnapping were incorrectly scored, resulting in an improper 28-point increase in sentencing guidelines, and reversed the sentences for resentencing.


Holding

The court held that both the kidnapping and burglary of a dwelling with battery convictions are first degree felonies and should have been scored identically as additional offenses, each resulting in 24 points, for a total of 48 points rather than 76 points. This 28-point reduction lowers the recommended sentencing range by one cell, requiring vacation and resentencing.


Headnotes

[1] Sentencing errors apparent from the record may be reviewed on appeal even without a contemporaneous objection.

[2] Felonies are classified by statute into categories including capital felony, life felony, felony of the first degree, felony of the second degree, and felony of the third…

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Sentencing errors may be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a contemporaneous objection in cases such as this when the error is apparent from the four corners of the record.”

Establishes that sentencing scoresheet errors can be reviewed without prior objection if they are clear from the record itself.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Carroll was convicted of ten separate offenses including sexual battery, kidnapping, and burglary of a dwelling with battery. The trial court scored t…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
DANIEL, Judge.

DANIEL, Judge.

Alvin L. Carroll appeals his judgments and sentences for ten separate offenses. The defendant contends that the trial court erred in its classification of two felony offenses which should have been scored as the same degree. Because of that error, the defendant asserts that an additional twenty-eight points were assessed on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet resulting in a one cell increase in his recommended sentence. We agree and reverse.

Sentencing errors may be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a contemporaneous objection in cases such as this when the error is apparent from the four corners of the record. Dailey v. State, 488 So. 2d 532 (Fla.1986); State v. Snow, 462 So. 2d 455 (Fla.1985). In this case it is the scoring of burglary of a dwelling with a battery therein1 and kidnapping2 counts that the defendant disputes. These convictions were scored in part II of the scoresheet as additional offenses. Only one, however, was counted as a first degree felony punishable by life. The other was scored as a first degree felony resulting in a total of 76 points for the two counts. The defendant correctly contends that both should be scored as first degree felonies punishable by life, resulting in a score of 48 points for the two reducing the total points by 28, and lowering the recommended range one cell.

We find no merit in the state’s contention that the two disputed offenses should have been scored as additional primary offenses along with two counts of sexual battery. Felonies are classified pursuant to section 775.081, Florida Statutes, as follows:

(1) Felonies are classified, for the purpose of sentence and for any other purpose specifically provided by statute, into the following categories:
(a) Capital felony;

(b) Life felony;

(c) Felony of the first degree;

(d) Felony of the second degree; and

(e) Felony of the third degree.

A capital felony and a life felony must be so designated by statute. Other felonies are of the particular degree designated by statute. Any crime declared by statute to be a felony without specification of degree is of the third degree except that this provision shall not affect felonies punishable by life imprisonment for the first offense, (emphasis added).

Both the kidnapping and robbery convictions in this case are first degree felonies, not life felonies such as the sexual batteries, and are to be scored as additional offenses pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(3) and (4). Convictions for the sexual batteries and the convictions for kidnapping and burglary of a dwelling with a battery therein are not within the same statutory degree even though the latter two have a possible life penalty.

Accordingly, we vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing upon correction of the scoresheet and reclassification of the two felony offenses as noted. CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED; SENTENCES VACATED; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur. . § 810.02(2)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985).

. § 787.01(l)(a)(2), Fla.Stat. (1985).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Riggs v. State, 540 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …multiple counts of the primary offense are thus scored as multiple primary offenses, crimes which are different, even as to degree, are scored as additional offenses. Compare Doner v. State, 515 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), with Carroll v. State, 530 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Appellant’s primary offenses, burglaries of a dwelling, are second degree felonies. See section 810.02(3), Florida Statutes. The other burglaries, which were committed in a structure or conveyance, are third degree felonies. Se…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw