AMI PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC.
v.
DOE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting the Petitioner's motion for default judgment against all non-claimants.
Petitioner AMI Professional Group, Inc. filed a motion for entry of default judgment against all potential claimants who failed to file a claim by a s…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw
d/b/a ANNA MARIA ISLAND DOLPHIN
TOURS FOR EXONERATION FROM OR
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AS OWNER
OF THE SALTY DOLPHIN III, 2018
CAROLINA SKIFF, HULL IDENTIFICATION
NUMBER – EKHM0711E818, ________________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Mac R. McCoy, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on August 30, 2022. (Doc. 63). Judge McCoy recommends that Petitioner AMI Professional Group, Inc.’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against All Non- Claimants (Doc. 62) be granted and final default judgment be entered against all potential claimants who failed to file or otherwise state a claim by October 4, 2021. No objections to the report and recommendation were filed, and the time to object has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F. 3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (table). Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge McCoy’s report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. The Court agrees with Judge McCoy’s well-reasoned factual findings and legal conclusions.
Consequently, Petitioner AMI Professional Group, Inc.’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against All Non-Claimants (Doc. 62) is granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) Judge McCoy’s report and recommendation (Doc. 63) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.
(2) Petitioner AMI Professional Group, Inc.’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against All Non-Claimants (Doc. 62) is hereby GRANTED. (3) The Clerk is directed to enter default judgment against all persons and entities that have not filed a claim in this action by the October 4, 2021, deadline. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 22nd day of September, 2022.
TOM BARBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marina Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 (11th Cir. 1993)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 1993 WL 259424 (S.D. Fla. 1993)