JOHNSTON
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

M.D. Fla. | 2022-09-14
No. 2:21-cv-464
District Court, M.D. Florida (2022)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff moved for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. No party objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Defendant. /

ORDER1

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell’s Report and Recommendation (R&R). (Doc. 32). Judge Mizell recommends granting in part Plaintiff Kristan Renea Johnston’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 30). No party objects to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. So the R&R is ripe for review. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” a magistrate judge’s R&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In the absence

Instead, when parties don’t object, a district court need only correct plain error as demanded by the interests of justice. See, e.g., Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F. App’x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985). Plain error exists if (1) “an error occurred”; (2) “the error was plain”; (3) “it affected substantial rights”; and (4) “not correcting the error would seriously affect the fairness of the judicial proceedings.” Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 197 F. 3d 1322, 1329 (11th Cir. 1999). After careful consideration and an independent review of the case, the

Court finds no plain error. So it accepts and adopts the R&R in full. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: United States Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell’s Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 32) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and the findings incorporated herein. 1. Plaintiff Kristan Renea Johnston’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 30) is GRANTED

in part. 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to amend the judgment to include an award to Plaintiff of $3,082.62 for attorney’s fees and expenses. This award may be paid directly to Plaintiff's counsel if the United States Department of Treasury determines that no federal debt is owed by Plaintiff. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on September 14, 2022.

,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Footnotes
1 Disclaimer: Papers hyperlinked to CM/ECF may be subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or their services or products, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is not responsible for a hyperlink’s functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review the R&R de novo. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw