JTH TAX LLC
v.
ARDOLINO
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se defendant cannot represent a limited liability company or another individual, even if they hold power of attorney.
During a status conference, the court informed a pro se defendant that he could not represent his LLC or his wife. The court reiterated that even a si…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Representation cases and more on FLexlaw
ORDER1
This Order follows the in-person status conference the Court held on August 30, 2022, with Plaintiff JTH Tax LLC and pro se Defendant Peter Ardolino. (Doc. 29). At the conference, the Court explained to Ardolino that he alone cannot represent the other Defendants, his company and his wife. Although Defendant Preferred Services 4U, LLC is a single member LLC, it is a separate legal entity that an attorney must represent. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654 (allowing parties in federal court to “plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel” (emphasis added)); Rowland v. Ca. Men's Colony, 506
in federal court otherwise than through a licensed attorney.”); Dougherty v. Snyder, 469 F. App’x 71, 72 (3d Cir. 2012) (finding that even LLCs with a single member must retain an attorney because they “have a legal identity separate from their members”).
For like reasons, Defendant Mary Ardolino too must hire an attorney or represent herself pro se. To be clear, her husband cannot represent her even if he holds power of attorney over her. See Ohio Nat. Life Assur. Corp. v. Langkau, No. 3:06-CV-290-J-33MCR, 2007 WL 1951500, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July
2, 2007) (stating that a party cannot be represented by a non-lawyer who holds power of attorney). Because neither Preferred Services nor Mary Ardolino are properly represented, the Court set new deadlines to resolve the matter and to answer
the Complaint at the conference. This Order memorializes those deadlines. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. On or before September 30, 2022, Preferred Services 4U, LLC,
must retain counsel to represent it and have counsel file a notice of appearance. 2. On or before September 30, 2022, Defendant Mary Ardolino must either (1) retain counsel and have counsel file a notice of
appearance in this case; or (2) file an appropriate notice with the Court stating that she intends to proceed pro se. 3. On or before October 14, 2022, Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. 4, On or before October 21, 2022, all parties must file a joint notice telling the Court if Plaintiff is still pursuing the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 2). DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on August 31, 2022.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record