JOHNSTON
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

M.D. Fla. | 2022-05-18
No. 2:21-cv-464
District Court, M.D. Florida (2022)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The court granted the Commissioner's unopposed motion, reversing the decision denying benefits and remanding the case for further proceedings.

Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff Kristan Renea Johnston sued the Commissioner of Social Security after her benefits were denied. The Commissioner filed an unopposed motion f…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Remand For Rehearing Social Security Disability Benefits Claim

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Remand For Rehearing cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

Defendant. /

ORDER1

Before the Court is the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand. (Doc. 27). A remand is proper based on the following: Upon remand, the Commissioner will offer Plaintiff a new hearing, take any other administration action deemed necessary, and issue a new decision.

(Doc. 27 at 1). Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion. Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court has the power to enter judgment, reversing and remanding a social security case for rehearing. See also Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-98 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 101-02 (1991). Given the parties’ representations and agreement on the

re Administrative Orders of the Chief Judge, No. 3:21-mc-1-TJC, Doc. 43 (Dec. 7, 2021). 4, The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate all deadlines, deny any pending motions as moot, and close the case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on May 18, 2022.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Footnotes
1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. matter, the Court grants the Motion, reverses, and remands for further proceedings. See Morgan v. Astrue, No. 2:11-cv-615-FtM-29SPC, 2012 WL 695840, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2012). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 27) is GRANTED. 2. The decision denying benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. 3. Any application for fees, costs, or expenses must comply with the Court’s Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases, In

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw