ALLEN
v.
FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied all motions for judgment as a matter of law filed by both the plaintiff and the defendants.
Plaintiff Dr. Marcus Allen moved for judgment as a matter of law, arguing defendants failed to prove he was no longer totally disabled under his insur…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Total Disability cases and more on FLexlaw
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Doc. #237) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law
(Doc. #238) is DENIED. 4. Defendant’s oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is
DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 29th day of March, 2022.
Z tkiok
JGHH E. STEELE
5 IOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: Counsel of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (U.S. 2000)
- Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2001)
- Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc., 480 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2007)