MANCUSO
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision.
Plaintiff sought review of the Commissioner's denial of benefits. The Magistrate Judge recommended reversal and remand.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 28; Report), entered on February 9, 2022. In the Report, Judge Richardson recommends that the Commissioner=s decision be reversed and remanded. See Report at 2, 30. No objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. The Court Amay accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.@ 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007). Upon independent review of the Magistrate Judge=s Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 28) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g), REVERSING the Commissioner=s decision and REMANDING with instructions to the Commissioner to conduct the fivestep sequential evaluation process in light of all the evidence, including the opinion evidence from treating, examining, and non-examining sources; to conduct any further proceedings deemed appropriate; and to develop a complete record. 3. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to close the file.
4. If Plaintiff ultimately prevails in this case upon remand to the Social Security Administration, any § 406(b) or § 18838(d)(2) fee application must be filed within the parameters set forth by the Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases entered in In re: Administrative Orders of the Chief Judge, Case No.: 3:21-mc-1-TJC (M.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2021). DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this 1st day of March, 2022.
MARCIA MORALES HOWARD
United States District Judge ja Copies to: Counsel of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marina Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 (11th Cir. 1993)