ROBINSON
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to treat the plaintiff's filing as a voluntary dismissal, denying the Commissioner's motion to dismiss as moot.
Plaintiff sued the Social Security Commissioner for denial of disability benefits while incarcerated. The Commissioner moved to dismiss for failure to…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 41(A)(1)(A)(I) cases and more on FLexlaw
Dushun Robinson sued the Social Security Commissioner because the Commissioner refused to dispense disability benefits to Robinson while he was in prison. (Doc. 1; Doc. 31 at 2.) The Commissioner moves to dismiss, arguing that Robinson did not exhaust the administrative appeal process before filing suit, so this Court does not have jurisdiction over Robinson’s claim. (Doc. 20.) By all appearances, Robinson agrees. He admits that he “neglected a step in procedure” and seeks to dismiss this action. (Doc. 26.) The Magistrate Judge held a hearing on the motions. (Doc. 27.) The Magistrate Judge confirmed that Robinson intends to withdraw the suit and acknowledges that he must seek administrative remedies before filing in this Court. (Doc. 31 at 3; Doc. 30.) Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court treat Robinson’s filing as a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41, deny the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss as moot, and close this case. The fourteen-day deadline for Robinson or the Commissioner to object to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation has passed (with an additional three days permitted for mailing). Neither party objected. Nevertheless, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d
603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2019) (Steele, J.). After a complete review, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Robinson means to voluntarily dismiss. (Doc. 26, Doc. 30.) Because the Commissioner has not answered or filed a motion for summary judgment, such a dismissal is self-executing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Matthews v. Gaither, 902 F. 2d 877, 880 (11th Cir. 1990) (“The dismissal [under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)] is effective immediately upon the filing of a written notice of dismissal, and no subsequent court order is required.”). Recognizing that Robinson dismissed this case, the Court denies the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss as moot and directs the Clerk to close this case. Accordingly, the following is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and made a part of this Order for all purposes. (Doc. 31.) 2. The Commissioner’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. (Doc. 20.)
3. The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE any pending motions and deadlines and to CLOSE this case. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on March 1, 2022.
patron Mizelle United States District Judge
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244 (M.D. Fla. 2019)
- Matthews v. Gaither, 902 F.2d 877 (11th Cir. 1990)