CROSBY
v.
AUSTIN

M.D. Fla. | 2022-03-01
No. 8:21-cv-2730
District Court, M.D. Florida (2022)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits regarding the vaccine mandate.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff Howard Crosby, a U.S. Army Reservist, sought a preliminary injunction against the military's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, alleging he was willi…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida this 1st day of March, 2022.

Af a Rie

“TOM BARBER (awst—‘“C:s~™S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw