INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
RANSDELL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's judgment, finding no clear error in its factual determination that the debtor did not attempt to evade taxes.
The IRS appealed the bankruptcy court's judgment that the debtor's federal income taxes were dischargeable. The core dispute was whether the debtor at…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Bankruptcy Discharge cases and more on FLexlaw
This bankruptcy appeal is before the Court following the timely appeal by appellant the Internal Revenue Service of the United States Bankruptcy Court’s April 1, 2021 Judgment in favor of plaintiff, Jennifer L. Ransdell, and against the IRS, adjudging that Ms. Ransdell’s unpaid 2012, 2013, and 2014 federal income taxes were not excepted from her bankruptcy discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(C) and were discharged by her March 25, 2020 discharge. The parties filed briefs in support of their respective positions. Docs. 6, 7, 8. The Court is sitting in an appellate capacity. It therefore reviews the bankruptcy court’s legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error. See, e.g., In re Yerian, 927 F. 3d 122, 127 (11th Cir. 2019) (citation and quotation omitted). Applying these standards, and upon careful consideration of the briefs and record on appeal, the Court concludes the bankruptcy court committed no errors of law and made no clearly erroneous factual findings. The parties agree on the legal standard that governed these proceedings. Their essential dispute is whether the bankruptcy court made a clearly erroneous factual finding when it determined that Ms. Ransdell’s conduct did not evidence an attempt to evade or avoid taxes, an issue on which the IRS bore the burden of proof at trial. The bankruptcy judge listened to Ms. Ransdell’s testimony at trial (Doc. 2-63) and had the opportunity to judge her credibility. In its Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law, the bankruptcy court stated that while it was a “very close call,” when compared to the facts of “dozens of other cases” the court reviewed, it did not find Ms. Ransdell’s conduct met the required standard. (Doc. 2-3 at 9). Having reviewed the law, the trial transcript and the rest of the record, the bankruptcy court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and the parties’ briefs, the Court discerns no clear error with this finding. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: The United States Bankruptcy Court’s Judgment in favor of plaintiff, Jennifer L. Ransdell, and against defendant, Internal Revenue Service of the Department of the Treasury of the United States of America (Doc. 2-2) is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida this 1st day of February, 2022.
TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN
SEs" —« United States District Judge s. Copies: Honorable Jerry A. Funk United States Bankruptcy Judge Counsel of record