EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
MESOAMERICAN BUILDERS, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that Mesoamerican's motion for summary judgment on its counterclaim must be denied because the counterclaim was abandoned by not being realleged in subsequent answers.
Evanston Insurance Company filed a declaratory judgment action concerning an insurance coverage dispute. Mesoamerican Builders, Inc. filed a countercl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Insurance Coverage Dispute cases and more on FLexlaw
Defendants. /
OPINION AND ORDER1
Before the Court is Mesoamerican’s Amended Motion2 for Summary Judgment on its Counterclaim and Motion to Stay (Doc. 54). Plaintiff responded in opposition (Doc. 56), to which Mesoamerican replied3 (Doc. 57).
Beristain, a construction worker, who fell from scaffolding and died at a work site in Naples, Florida. Beristain’s Estate sued eight defendants (various companies working at the work site that day and one individual) in state court for wrongful death, including Mesoamerican, a construction company.
Evanston sued a year ago (Doc. 1) and Mesoamerican answered (Doc. 10). The answer included a counterclaim for declaratory relief, seeking a declaration that Evanston has an obligation to defend and indemnify Mesoamerican against claims in the underlying suit (Doc. 10). Since then,
Evanston amended the complaint twice (Docs. 29, 38), to which Mesoamerican filed answers but never realleged its counterclaim (Docs. 32, 40). The Motion is easily denied because there is no counterclaim on which summary judgment may be sought. Since Mesoamerican never realleged its counterclaim, the counterclaim was abandoned. See Bahama Bay II Condo Ass’n, Inc. v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 374 F. Supp. 2d 1274, 1278 (M.D. Fla. 2019) (denying summary judgment because the counterclaim was not included in an answer and deemed abandoned); Stonen Tech. (HK) Co., Ltd. v. GlobalGeeks,
Inc., No. 20-cv-23251-BLOOM/Louis, 2021 WL 86776, at *3-6 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 11, 2021). See also Fed. Proc., L. Ed., § 62:201 (Nov. 2021 Update) (“[A] counterclaim is not a pleading but must be stated in a pleading and therefore can be asserted only in the defendant’s answer.”). As Mesoamerican seeks summary judgment on an abandoned counterclaim, it will be denied. But that does not mean Mesoamerican abandoned its position that Evanston must defend and indemnify it. Mesoamerican’s affirmative defenses allege as much. (Doc. 40). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Mesoamerican’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on its Counterclaim and Motion to Stay (Doc. 54) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on January 20, 2022.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record