MISHIYEV
v.
CIERRA

M.D. Fla. | 2021-12-01
No. 2:21-cv-162
District Court, M.D. Florida (2021) Negative Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that counterclaims asserted against a debtor are automatically stayed by the bankruptcy filing, while the debtor's own claims and counterclaims against non-debtors are not stayed.


Facts & Procedural History

A Chapter 7 Trustee was substituted for a debtor who had filed for bankruptcy and was also controlling litigation for a wholly owned LLC. The court ad…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

ELISEO CIERRA and IHEARTMEDIA INC.,

Defendants. /

ORDER1

Erik Mishiyev filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and Beth Ann Scharrer, as Chapter 7 Trustee, has been substituted in his place. She is also controlling the litigation positions of Short-E LLC, which is wholly owned by Mishiyev. Given this, the Court directed the parties to state their positions on what impact (if any) the automatic stay has on the counterclaims asserted against Plaintiffs. (Doc. 46, Doc. 59, Doc. 63). The parties responded. (Doc. 58, Doc. 65)

1180 (11th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The stay, however, would usually apply to Defendants’ counterclaims—as those are against a debtor. Koolik v. Markowitz, 40 F. 3d 567, 568 (2d Cir. 1994) (“Thus, an answer that asserts a counterclaim against a plaintiff who becomes a bankruptcy debtor is an ‘action or proceeding against the debtor’ within the meaning of § 362(a)(1), notwithstanding the fact that the plaintiff initiated the lawsuit.”); Parker v. Bain, 68 F. 3d 1131, 1137 (9th Cir. 1995); Vasile v. Dean Witter Reynolds, 20 F. Supp. 2d 465, 499 (E.D.N.Y. 1998).

Because Mishiyev has filed for bankruptcy, the counterclaims asserted against him were automatically stayed under § 362(a). The automatic stay does not apply to Plaintiffs’ claims, nor does it apply to Defendants’ counterclaims against Short-E, which will proceed.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. Defendants’ counterclaims against Erik Mishiyev (Doc. 40) are STAYED. Plaintiffs must notify the Court, in writing, within seven (7) days of the bankruptcy proceedings concluding.

2. The Clerk is directed to add a stay flag to the file.

3. Plaintiffs must provide the Court with a status update on the bankruptcy proceedings by March1, 2022, and every ninety days thereafter. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on December1, 2021.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Footnotes
1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. A bankruptcy filing typically operates as an automatic stay of all proceedings against the debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). When the debtor is the plaintiff, the automatic stay usually does not apply to the plaintiff’s claims. Crosby v. Monroe Cnty., 394 F. 3d 1328, 1331 (11th Cir. 2004) (“The automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 362, does not extend to lawsuits initiated by the debtor.”); Slater v. U.S. Steel Corp., 871 F. 3d 1174,

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw