MEISER
v.
GEGWETCH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendants failed to establish diversity jurisdiction by not sufficiently identifying the domicile of the LLC members.
Defendants removed a case to federal court, but the court questioned subject-matter jurisdiction. The court ordered defendants to supplement their not…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Notice Of Removal cases and more on FLexlaw
ORDER1
Before the Court is Defendants’ Supplement to Notice of Removal. (Doc. 11). On November 17, 2021, the Court directed Defendants to supplement their Notice of Removal by identifying the LLC members’ domicile and to provide additional information on the amount in controversy to show cause why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 7). The Court warned Defendants that failure to do so will result in remand without further notice. (Doc. 7 at 5). Defendants’ Supplement does
por A. v. Lama, 6338 F. 3d 13830, 1341 (11th Cir. 2011). Consequently, the Court cannot determine that diversity of citizenship is present and will remand this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. This action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Lee County, Florida. 2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to transmit a certified copy of this Opinion and Order to the Clerk of that Court. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions or deadlines and close the case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on November 24, 2021.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record