WILLIAMS
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the Commissioner's unopposed motion, reversing the decision denying benefits and remanding the case for further proceedings.
The Commissioner filed an unopposed motion for entry of judgment with remand, seeking to obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert and off…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Remand For Further Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
Defendant. /
OPINION AND ORDER1
Before the Court is the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand. (Doc. 21). The Commissioner believes that remand is appropriate to accomplish the following: [T]he Commissioner will obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to determine whether there are a significant number of jobs in the national economy that Plaintiff can perform, pose a complete hypothetical question to the vocational expert that includes all the Plaintiff’s exertional and non-exertional limitations, identify and resolve any apparent conflicts between the vocational expert’s testimony and information in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing, and take any other action deemed necessary.
reversing and remanding a social security case for rehearing. See also Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-98 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 101-02 (1991). Given the parties’ representations and agreement on the matter, the Court grants the Motion, reverses, and remands for further
proceedings. See Morgan v. Astrue, No. 2:11-cv-615-FtM-29SPC, 2012 WL 695840, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Mar.1, 2012). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:
(1) The Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 21) is GRANTED. (2) The decision denying benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for
further proceedings. (3) If Plaintiff prevails on remand, Plaintiff must comply with the Court’s November 14, 2012, standing order in Miscellaneous Case No. 6:12-mc-124-Orl-22.
(4) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate all deadlines, deny all pending motions as moot, and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on November 2, 2021.
ites POLSTER atta
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (U.S. 1993)
- Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1991)