ERIC WATSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. State, 538 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
  …1 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Compare Wright, Richardson, Cardwell, Neal (527 So. 2d 966), Willingham and Crayton, with the inconsistent holdings in Clark and Teemer. . See Clark v. State, 530 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); McCray v. State, 531 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); the dissent in Teemer v. State, 531 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Heath v. State, 532 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); T.J. v. State, 534 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Meadows v. State, 534 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Alvar…
• Elvis Evans v. State, 543 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …ve, and notwithstanding that the majority includes — in what must be a judicial first — the author of the opinion which I believe requires a different result, I am compelled to dissent. It is my view that Judge Barfield’s opinion in McCray v. State, 531 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) is correctly reasoned and is applicable here. The thrust of McCray is that the legislature could not have meant to punish, as a separate offense, the possession of an implement which becomes a forbidden item of narcotics paraph…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• State v. Alphonso McCRAY, 561 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1990)
  …PER CURIAM. We have for review McCray v. State, 531 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), to answer the following certified question: “Whether the Florida Legislature intended to punish, as two separate offenses, the single act of sale of a controlled substance in a container (i.e., whether the legislature intended…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Whitney v. State, 493 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
• Dock Dewayne Bush v. State, 519 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)