MOKRIS
v.
UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
Plaintiff filed a Motion for Judicial Notice, which the Magistrate Judge recommended be denied without prejudice. No objections were filed by either p…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Deference To Factual Findings cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #40), filed October 7, 2021, recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Notice (Doc. #36) be denied without prejudice. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983).
In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in
Both parties are represented by counsel. whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (lith Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F. 3d 116 (llth Cir. 1994) (Table). After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED : 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #40) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Notice (Doc. #36) is DENIED without prejudice. DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 25th day of October, 2021.
J — Afr ff le by ) Ah Took
JOHN E. STEELE
SHHIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: Counsel of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marina Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 (11th Cir. 1993)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 1993 WL 259424 (S.D. Fla. 1993)
- Williams v. Wainwright, 459 U.S. 1112 (U.S. 1983)