THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
LEROY BROWN, APPELLEE
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
LEROY BROWN, APPELLEE
531 So. 2d 416
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Cobb v. State, 511 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); White v. State, 458 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), rev. denied, 464 So. 2d 556 (Fla.1985); DeConingh v. State, 433 So. 2d 501, 504 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005, 104 S.Ct. 995, 79 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984); State v. Rizo, 463 So. 2d 1165, 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. Gonzalez, 447 So. 2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. Stephens, 441 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smiddy v. State, 627 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…hold that the circuit court, in reaching its decision, impermissibly reweighed and reevaluated the evidence, and thus departed from the essential requirements of law. Horatio Enter., Inc. v. Rabin, 614 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); State v. Burke, 531 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). “[A]ppellate courts must interpret the evidence in a manner most favorable to sustain the trial court’s ruling.” Horatio Enter., Inc., 614 So. 2d at 556. If there is any competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’…
-
Q.G.S. Dev., Inc. v. Nat'l Lining Sys., Inc., 386 So. 3d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
Authorities Cited
- Florida v. Deconingh, 465 U.S. 1005 (U.S. 1984)
- DeCONINGH v. State, 433 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 1983)
- Bristol Corp. v. United States, 465 U.S. 1005 (U.S. 1984)
- Cobb v. State, 511 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- State v. Rizo, 463 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
- Taylor v. State, 458 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
- White v. State, 458 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
- State v. Robert and Denise Stephens, 441 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- State v. Celestino Gonzalez, 447 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)