GEORGE L. FORM AND HELEN C. FORM, HIS WIFE, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
RAPHAEL STEINHARDT, APPELLEE
GEORGE L. FORM AND HELEN C. FORM, HIS WIFE, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
RAPHAEL STEINHARDT, APPELLEE
531 So. 2d 416
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appeal taken from the order denying the appellants’ 1.540 motion below is dismissed for being untimely. Francisco v. Victoria Marine Shipping, Inc., 486 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 494 So. 2d 1153 (Fla.1986). As to the attorney’s fee and costs awarded in the order under review, the appellee has agreed in open court to waive such fee and costs and, accordingly, the same are hereby vacated.
DISMISSED IN PART; VACATED IN PART.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smiddy v. State, 627 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…hold that the circuit court, in reaching its decision, impermissibly reweighed and reevaluated the evidence, and thus departed from the essential requirements of law. Horatio Enter., Inc. v. Rabin, 614 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); State v. Burke, 531 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). “[A]ppellate courts must interpret the evidence in a manner most favorable to sustain the trial court’s ruling.” Horatio Enter., Inc., 614 So. 2d at 556. If there is any competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’…
Authorities Cited
- Francisco v. Victoria Marine Shipping, Inc., 486 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)