WOODBECK

v.

ROSIE'S CAFE & GRILL, INC.

ROSIE’S CAFE & GRILL, INC. and JOANNE FITZGERALD,

Defendants. /

ORDER1

Before the Court is Plaintiff Patricia Woodbeck’s Motion for default judgment against Defendants Rosie’s Café & Grill, Inc. and Joanne Fitzgerald (Doc. 22). No response was filed, and the time to do so passed. The Court grants the motion. Woodbeck brought a Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) claim against Defendants for unpaid overtime wages. (Doc. 1). She got a clerk’s default against Defendants on December 18, 2020. (Doc. 13). Now, Plaintiff seeks a default judgment.

WL 1172925, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2018), report and recommendation adopted, 2018 WL 1152393 (Mar. 5, 2018). When entering a default judgment, a court “must ensure that the well-pleaded allegations in the complaint, which are taken as true due to the default, actually state a substantive cause of action and that there is a substantive, sufficient basis in the pleadings for the particular relief sought.” Tyco Fire & Sec., LLC v. Alcocer, 218 F. App’x 860, 863 (11th Cir. 2007). “In deciding the complaint’s sufficiency, the court applies the same standard as a motion to dismiss.” Mutka v. Top Hat Imports, LLC,

No. 2:18-cv-5390-FtM-38MRM, 2018 WL 6168124, at *1 (M.D. Fla, Nov. 26, 2018). “To survive a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff’s pleading must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). A defaulted defendant admits all well-pleaded allegations of fact, but not unsupported facts or conclusions of law. Surtain v. Hamlin Terrace Found., 789 F. 3d 1239, 1245 (11th Cir. 2015).

Woodbeck moves for an entry of default judgment because Defendants have not appeared in this action. Given the well-pled facts, Woodbeck is a covered employee—while Rosie’s Café and Fitzgerald are covered employers— under the FLSA. See Hamann v. Little Italy’s Meatballs, LLC, No. 8:20-cv-

2589-VMC-AEP, 2021 WL 1931257, at *2-3 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 31, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, 2021 WL 1541086 (Apr. 20, 2021). So the FLSA applies, and the Court turns to the specific claim. To recover for unpaid overtime, Woodbeck must show “(1) an employee worked unpaid overtime, and (2) the employer knew or should have known of the overtime work.” Bailey v. TitleMax of Ga., Inc., 776 F. 3d 797, 801 (11th Cir. 2015). Based on the facts, there is a sufficient basis for judgment because Woodbeck stated a plausible claim.

From August 2019 to February 2020, Woodbeck regularly worked over forty hours of overtime in a workweek. (Doc. 22-1). Yet Defendants did not pay Woodbeck for this overtime. And when she questioned Defendants, they “offered Plaintiff improper excuses as to why she wasn’t entitled to any relief at all.” (Doc. 1 at 5). In doing so, “Defendants brazenly refused to pay Plaintiff overtime when her paystubs showed that she worked more than forty hours in a workweek.” (Doc. 1 at 1). These facts not only establish liability. They also undercut any good-faith defense Defendants might have raised, which could have hindered liquidated damages. See Alvarez Perez v. Sanford-Orlando

Kennel Club, Inc., 515 F. 3d 1150, 1163 (11th Cir. 2008). At bottom, Woodbeck stated a claim for FLSA overtime violations. And the Court finds default judgment proper. For default judgment, “Damages may be awarded only if the record adequately reflects the basis for award via a hearing or a demonstration by detailed affidavits establishing the necessary facts.” Adolph Coors Co. v. Movement Against Racism and the Klan, 777 F. 2d 1538, 1544 (11th Cir. 1985) (cleaned up). In a declaration, Woodbeck outlined and calculated the unpaid overtime with enough facts. Defendants owe Woodbeck $1,083.04 in unliquidated overtime, which comes to $2,166.08 after adding liquidated damages. Finding no error in her math or need for a hearing, the Court enters judgment for the liquidated amount. See Tara Prods., Inc. v. Hollywood

Gadgets, Inc., 449 F. App’x 908, 911-12 (11th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment

(Doc. 22) is GRANTED. (2) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a default judgment in favor of Plaintiff against Defendants Rosie’s Café & Grill, Inc. and Joanne Fitzgerald, jointly and severally, for $2,166.08. (3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions or deadlines and close the case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on June 29, 2021.

, Lh latralto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record